- implementing an script that there is the same distance from cp -> intel on both sides
- no damage dropoff
Build and Shoot League Season 3 Suggestions!
Russian CS:GO Players ...
HeyItsVen: dröhnen billigen russentechno aus billigboxen
HeyItsVen: sitzen auf plastikcampingstühlen
HeyItsVen: trinken vodka aus plastikbechern
HeyItsVen: und spielen auf toastern ...
I have been thinking of what date to end season 3 on.
I want to start it on Monday September 30th. I initially thought of ending on November 17th. roughly 6 weeks to play as many matches as you can. Followed by 4 weeks to finish the playoffs. But that 4 weeks is in the middle of winter holidays. So it might be impossible to schedule any matches doing that time. What can we do?
I have a few ideas.
End the regular season jan 1st-ish and have the playoffs in January.
End the regular on November 17th like planned tried to have the playoffs finished by January 1st but if it isnt just go forward with season 4 with an incomplete season 3.
I want to start it on Monday September 30th. I initially thought of ending on November 17th. roughly 6 weeks to play as many matches as you can. Followed by 4 weeks to finish the playoffs. But that 4 weeks is in the middle of winter holidays. So it might be impossible to schedule any matches doing that time. What can we do?
I have a few ideas.
End the regular season jan 1st-ish and have the playoffs in January.
End the regular on November 17th like planned tried to have the playoffs finished by January 1st but if it isnt just go forward with season 4 with an incomplete season 3.
1 word, Arena.
Arena, first to 10 or 20, would make for an epic clan battle.
Arena, first to 10 or 20, would make for an epic clan battle.
[IGN:] Kitten, or another random cat alias.
Master of the sinister arts.
bullets wrote:1 word, Arena.Fixed that for you
Arena, first to 10 or 20, would make for an boring tacticless dull clan battle only little codfaggots would enjoy.
danhezee wrote:I have been thinking of what date to end season 3 on.
I want to start it on Monday September 30th. I initially thought of ending on November 17th. roughly 6 weeks to play as many matches as you can. Followed by 4 weeks to finish the playoffs. But that 4 weeks is in the middle of winter holidays. So it might be impossible to schedule any matches doing that time. What can we do?
I have a few ideas.
End the regular season jan 1st-ish and have the playoffs in January.
End the regular on November 17th like planned tried to have the playoffs finished by January 1st but if it isnt just go forward with season 4 with an incomplete season 3.
I think it would be great danhezee, at least for us brs. In relation to what said lelue, mumble to be the only voice chat I think it would not solve much.
I feel like intel towers are too strong at the moment so I'd suggest giving the offense more tools to combat against them:
1. Buff SMG block damage back to the 0.75 levels.
2. Buff Shotgun block damage to some ridiculous levels so it can be used to harass builder and damage tower from a distance. This would make shotgun actually useful in the competitive matches.
If these suggestions are a bit too much of a change from the normal gameplay, maybe CP -> Intel distance could be fixed to be longer.
1. Buff SMG block damage back to the 0.75 levels.
2. Buff Shotgun block damage to some ridiculous levels so it can be used to harass builder and damage tower from a distance. This would make shotgun actually useful in the competitive matches.
If these suggestions are a bit too much of a change from the normal gameplay, maybe CP -> Intel distance could be fixed to be longer.
IMO the intel to CP distance being further is better.
I guess the only problem is the intel spawns randomly so it could end up closer? Unless a spawn point for each new intel spawn is made or alternatively an area around the CP in which the intel is unable to spawn in.
I guess the only problem is the intel spawns randomly so it could end up closer? Unless a spawn point for each new intel spawn is made or alternatively an area around the CP in which the intel is unable to spawn in.
Shaz wrote:IMO the intel to CP distance being further is better.You can determine the spawn point of everything by adding a little script to that little txt file which goes with every map.
I guess the only problem is the intel spawns randomly so it could end up closer? Unless a spawn point for each new intel spawn is made or alternatively an area around the CP in which the intel is unable to spawn in.
It's a Christmas miracle!
I like the idea that the fall damage should be off.
jdrew wrote:Why would mumble be the only allowed client?Lelue thinks I gave Ms3 tips via Skype..I don't even have a mic wtf.He wants to see how many and who is in the talk-room.
I think he means only the players who are playing at the moment should be in this talk-room and not in skype where nothing is moderated.
PS: Lelue I didn't give Ms3 tips,kthxbai
I like the idea that the fall damage should be off.But building the tower in a way which makes attackers die from fall damage once the got on top of the tower is an important strategy
Lostmotel wrote:I like the idea that the fall damage should be off.But building the tower in a way which makes attackers die from fall damage once the got on top of the tower is an important strategy
Venator wrote:Yeah it is. But I wouldnt say die, becasue its nearly impossible to cap if the tower is high, becasue you build an other soul up and thats it. I would say that at least 1hp should reamin, so the attacker would be dead within the next schoot, but he still has a chance to move the intel.Lostmotel wrote:I like the idea that the fall damage should be off.But building the tower in a way which makes attackers die from fall damage once the got on top of the tower is an important strategy
Anyway, as an attacker I like the idea:P
What do you guys think about an smg-limit per team. Like 2 smgs can be used at the same time.
-
Fluttershy
Build and Shoot's 1st Birthday
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:00 pm
Why limit an inferior option to begin with?
1.21 gigawatts!?!
let teams at least have 3 core members instead of 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests