People switching sides

[xn1]

It´s ridiculous; once a team starts wining half of your team mates switch to the other side
leaving your team in further disadvantage.
I think it ruins the gameplay.
I mean the point of the hole thing it´s not merely wining, so why would you leave an already
losing team into further disadvantage.
Are there any good servers with auto team balance or fixed teams?

[GreaseMonkey]

What pisses me off is when I'm kicking ass, and then all the new players join MY team, and not the other team, mostly because I have a rather high score.

I really only join the team that appears to be winning in the circumstance where I either need to play with or play against specific people. Otherwise, well, as you might be able to tell from my avatar, I'm a sucker for punishment.

[White Hot]

I don't really mind, because most servers have autobalance. One thing that I will admit to doing is switching to a team my clanmates are on, which will usually make that team stacked enough to base rape.

[Sn3ky]

I don't really mind, because most servers have autobalance. One thing that I will admit to doing is switching to a team my clanmates are on, which will usually make that team stacked enough to base rape.

I agree with you on that one. I would usually switch sides if my friend im talking to on skype is on the other team.

But usually I don't see any autobalance unless the server is full. (or is playing game mode infiltration). The servers hosts may have to screw around with the scripting a little to make a true autobalance.

[Revolet]

I usually just switch to the team with the least players.
It give the losing team a better chance of winning, and I like the challenge.

[Reki]

Otherwise, well, as you might be able to tell from my avatar, I'm a sucker for punishment.

No, I can tell you're just a lazy person who'd rather sleep than do your job. This description doesn't really fit you, so maybe you should try Remilia instead.

Moving on, I personally find it more fun to be playing at a disadvantage. Unite the chaotic crowd of the losing team under you, and cobble together a coalition to hold the line and slowly regain the ground.

[Vucgy]

I got no problem with that but there is something that pisses me off totally :
So a Blue Griefer destroys everything of blue defence and a votekick starts agains him and few enemys players says we wont /y we want that he destroys your defences, the same is if (lets say) Green has a Hacker but a real none and a Blue player starts a votekick and some Greens say We wont kick him he is on our side ... Thats just a catastrophe

[TB_]

Nobody has cared about which team wins since before custom maps anyway.

[Articsledder]

Nobody has cared about which team wins since before custom maps anyway.

I literally haven't played seriously on the Blue Team since my second AoS game...


I really hate it more when the other team empties out, less people to shoot, but more importantly less people on the server, which results in a downward spiral till I'm alone.

[H@nkthet@nk]

It annoys me to no end when people on the losing team switch to greif all of your teams fortifications.

what I have to consistently do to my new greifing teammates is just shoot them in the back of the head until they leave.